{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0001.txt","chunk_index":1,"documents_referenced":["一零四年新都市計畫局第三次通盤檢討增額容積規定","劉秀玲提交之澄清說明","圖管條例第八十條之二","都更條例第六十五條","都計法第二十七條","都計法第二十四條","京華城補充說明資料"],"end_seconds":595,"keywords":["TOD","京華城","個案變更","圖管條例","容積獎勵","衛京集團","都委會","都計法"],"legal_issues":["圖管條例第八十條之二（TOD精神）之適用性","容積獎勵之法定依據與新創獎勵專案之合法性","都更條例第六十五條之適用性（本案非都更，無法適用）","都計法第二十四條（個案變更）與第二十七條（公辦變更）之區別"],"legal_issues_raw":["都更條例第六十五條之適用性（本案非都更，無法適用）","都計法第二十四條（個案變更）與第二十七條（公辦變更）之區別","圖管條例第八十條之二（TOD精神）之適用性","容積獎勵之法定依據與新創獎勵專案之合法性"],"participants":["劉秀玲","張家文","彭振聲","應曉薇","柯文哲","沈慶京","王金棠","黃潔穎","黃台生"],"participants_raw":["劉秀玲（都委會）","王金棠","應曉薇（議員）","黃台生委員","張家文","黃潔穎","沈慶京","柯文哲","彭振聲"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0001","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":295,"summary":"本段逐字稿討論京華城案爭議，重點在於京華城試圖以「符合都更精神」或「個案變更」之理由爭取容積獎勵，但都委會幕僚（如劉秀玲）認為應參考現有圖管條例或TOD機制而非新創獎勵專案。過程中涉及衛京集團透過特定管道向市長室傳遞訊息，對劉秀玲表達不滿並施壓，導致劉秀玲隨後提交澄清說明，強調京華城案為首例利用都計法第二十四條爭取容積獎勵之案件。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0001.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0001.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0001","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0001/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0001/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0001/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}