{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0003.txt","chunk_index":3,"documents_referenced":["提報單","議會質詢紀錄","都委會7、8、3次會議紀錄","都市計畫公告 (10月1日)"],"end_seconds":1185,"keywords":["京華城案","冗容積","利益衝突","對價性","都委會","都市計畫變更"],"legal_issues":["利益衝突與公正性：都委會主席同時擔任案件PM，是否影響審核之客觀性。","對價性不足：爭議焦點在於獎勵之對價關係是否充分，以及相關審查資料是否完整。","行政程序之適法性：關於冗容積獎勵的法律依據及其是否突破現行法令。","都市計畫變更之適法性：本案是否適用都市更新法或僅為個案處理。"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政程序之適法性：關於冗容積獎勵的法律依據及其是否突破現行法令。","對價性不足：爭議焦點在於獎勵之對價關係是否充分，以及相關審查資料是否完整。","利益衝突與公正性：都委會主席同時擔任案件PM，是否影響審核之客觀性。","都市計畫變更之適法性：本案是否適用都市更新法或僅為個案處理。"],"participants":["何方子","劉秀玲","彭振聲","徐國誠","徐阿雪","林中堅","林欽榮","柯文哲","苗博拉","辯護人","邵琇珮","郭瓊","馮正明","黃一平","黃臺生"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","彭振聲 (副柯文哲/都委會主席)","邵琇珮","徐國誠 (委員)","林欽榮","馮正明","黃臺生","郭瓊","何方子","徐阿雪","劉秀玲 (局長)","林中堅 (局長)","苗博拉 (議員)","黃一平 (局長)","辯護人"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0003","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":885,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案在都委會審議過程中的爭議。重點在於市長是否透過提報單知悉本案為「自創冗容積」且突破法令之首例；副市長彭振聲身兼都委會主席與案件PM，被質疑存在利益衝突（既當裁判又當球員）而喪失客觀性。此外，提及9月9日都委會會議中，委員對對價性不足及適法性提出質疑，但最終由主席主導通過，導致京華城獲得大量額外樓地板面積，並提及後續市議員苗博拉在議會中對其法律依據的質詢。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0003.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0003.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0003","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0003/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0003/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0003/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}