{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0004.txt","chunk_index":4,"documents_referenced":["最高法院103年度第四次刑事庭決議","最高法院109年臺上大字第3214號裁定","柯文哲市長手令","榮進公司與北市府簽訂之協議書","榮進公司陳情書","產發局回函（111年2月7日）","都更容積獎勵辦法（第10、11、13、18條）"],"end_seconds":1480,"keywords":["圖利罪","容積獎勵","手令","榮進公司","樓地板面積","消極不作為","產權登記面積","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["公務員之消極不作為是否構成圖利罪（引用最高法院109年臺上大字第3214號裁定）","協議書引用法源（都更容積獎勵辦法）之正確性","明知違背法令而仍容認推行之主觀犯意","行政處分之合法性與對特定廠商之利益輸送"],"legal_issues_raw":["公務員之消極不作為是否構成圖利罪（引用最高法院109年臺上大字第3214號裁定）","明知違背法令而仍容認推行之主觀犯意","行政處分之合法性與對特定廠商之利益輸送","協議書引用法源（都更容積獎勵辦法）之正確性"],"participants":["朱亞虎","林崇吉","柯文哲","檢察官","董金","議員"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","林崇吉（產發局相關人員）","朱亞虎","董金","檢察官（提及）","議員（提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0004","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1180,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論柯文哲市長涉嫌圖利之案件。重點在於分析公務員之「消極不作為」是否構成圖利罪，並詳細描述產發局在處理榮進公司都市計畫變更案時，關於「產權登記面積」與「樓地板面積」之爭議。文中提到柯市長在產發局發函告知條件不符後，於2月10日拜會魏京熟，隨後下達「怎麼做都行，快就好」之手令，導致產發局在壓力下同意該條件。最後提及協議書中引用之法源依據（都更容積獎勵辦法）與實際內容不符之疑慮。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0004.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0004.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0004","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0004/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0004/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0004/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}