{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["公務員對話記錄","公展簽程","法院判決書","產發局函件","都發局研議文件"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["120284容積","不法容積","京華城案","密會","行政施壓","都委會","都計法"],"legal_issues":["120284 容積保障之法律性質（一次性 vs 永久性）","是否違反都市計畫法（都計法）第二條","涉嫌透過密會施壓公務員，達成不法容積之獲取","行政流程是否被刻意操弄以規避法律限制"],"legal_issues_raw":["120284 容積保障之法律性質（一次性 vs 永久性）","是否違反都市計畫法（都計法）第二條","涉嫌透過密會施壓公務員，達成不法容積之獲取","行政流程是否被刻意操弄以規避法律限制"],"participants":["劉秀玲","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","蔡律月","都委會幕僚（胡小姐）","都發局公務員","黃書勳"],"participants_raw":["沈慶京","柯文哲","檢察官","都發局公務員","都委會幕僚（胡小姐）","劉秀玲","蔡律月","黃書勳"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"本段逐字稿分析了京華城案中，沈慶京與柯文哲透過多次密會，試圖恢復被法院判定為一次性的 120284 容積保障，並透過行政壓力使北市府及都委會違背專業意見而通過計畫變更。內容詳述了公務員在面對高層施壓時的無力感，以及對行政流程被操弄的質疑。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}