{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["卷證","調職簽程"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["京華城案","依法行政","容積獎勵","政治與法律","林選理案","權力干預"],"legal_issues":["公務員是否因上級壓力而違法行政","柯文哲是否介入行政流程以利特定財團（京華城）獲取容積獎勵","行政程序之合法性與專業判斷是否受干預","貪汙犯罪之認定（給予私人或財團特權）"],"legal_issues_raw":["公務員是否因上級壓力而違法行政","柯文哲是否介入行政流程以利特定財團（京華城）獲取容積獎勵","貪汙犯罪之認定（給予私人或財團特權）","行政程序之合法性與專業判斷是否受干預"],"participants":["劉秀玲","彭振聲","應曉薇","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","法官","陳慶涵"],"participants_raw":["檢察官","柯文哲","彭振聲","劉秀玲（組長）","沈慶京（局長）","應曉薇","陳慶涵","法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"檢察官在法庭上進行結陳，描述北市府在京華城案中，公務員因恐懼柯文哲市長（如林選理案之懲處）而不敢依法行政，導致原本應被駁回的申請在市長介入後，由都發局等單位加速行政流程並量身訂製容積獎勵。檢察官同時回應柯文哲對檢方「邪惡」的指控，強調檢察官之職責在於追求公平正義，主張政治與法律應分開處理。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}