{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0011.txt","chunk_index":11,"documents_referenced":["3月10日便當會紀錄","公司內部簽呈（關於捐贈民眾黨之請款紀錄）","京華城公司陳情函（3月17日）"],"end_seconds":3545,"keywords":["京華城","人頭捐款","便當會","容積爭議","政治獻金","都委會","都發局"],"legal_issues":["京華城容積爭議案之行政干預","政治獻金捐贈之合法性（人頭捐款）","權錢交易之因果關係認定"],"legal_issues_raw":["京華城容積爭議案之行政干預","政治獻金捐贈之合法性（人頭捐款）","權錢交易之因果關係認定"],"participants":["張志澄","應曉薇","朱亞虎","柯文哲","沈慶京","陳俊源"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","沈慶京","陳俊源","朱亞虎","應曉薇","張志澄"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0011","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":3245,"summary":"本段逐字稿分析京華城案中，沈慶京與柯文哲之間可能的利益交換時序。內容涵蓋從2月20日密會、2月21日專案會議，到3月10日便當會中柯文哲指示都發局將訴求提交都委會研議，隨後京華城公司於3月17日發出陳情函，以及3月24至26日沈慶京透過人頭捐款給民眾黨的過程。分析者認為，儘管缺乏會議紀錄，但從後續行政動作與捐款時間點的緊密關聯，可推論兩人密會內容涉及京華城容積爭議及政治獻金捐贈。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0011.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0011.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0011","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0011/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0011/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0011/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}