{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0014.txt","chunk_index":14,"documents_referenced":["徐永明案判決","最高法院相關判決","朱亞虎與李文宗之通訊訊息","陳超民案判決"],"end_seconds":4430,"keywords":["京華城案","人頭帳戶","對價關係","政治獻金","行賄"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金是否可作為行賄手段之法律認定","行賄罪之構成要件","行賄與收賄之對價關係判定"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄與收賄之對價關係判定","政治獻金是否可作為行賄手段之法律認定","行賄罪之構成要件"],"participants":["朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","沈慶京","法官","陳俊源"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","沈慶京","陳俊源","朱亞虎","李文宗","法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0014","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":4130,"summary":"本段內容分析京華城案中，沈慶京透過陳俊源與朱亞虎，以政治獻金名義向民眾黨捐款 210 萬元，實則為行賄以換取北市府對京華城案陳情的關注。文中強調該筆款項並非基於政治理念，而是長官指示之行賄行為，並引用最高法院判決及相關案例（如陳超民案、徐永明案）說明政治獻金不可作為行賄管道，且朱亞虎的通訊紀錄顯示其協助行賄之意圖。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0014.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0014.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0014","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0014/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0014/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0014/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}