{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0021.txt","chunk_index":21,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄（朱亞虎之陳述）","對話紀錄（李文宗回覆「市長和我們都心存感激」）"],"end_seconds":6495,"keywords":["京華城案","密會","捐款","朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","沈慶京","經驗法則"],"legal_issues":["李文宗之回覆訊息是否可視為柯文哲已知情的證據","柯文哲之抗辯是否符合經驗法則","柯文哲是否對沈慶京的捐款及相關利益輸送知情（主觀認定）","沈慶京捐款與京華城案是否存在對價關係"],"legal_issues_raw":["沈慶京捐款與京華城案是否存在對價關係","柯文哲是否對沈慶京的捐款及相關利益輸送知情（主觀認定）","李文宗之回覆訊息是否可視為柯文哲已知情的證據","柯文哲之抗辯是否符合經驗法則"],"participants":["審判長","張哲陽","朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","沈慶京","蔡壁如","辯方/檢方"],"participants_raw":["審判長","辯方/檢方（發言人）","柯文哲","沈慶京","李文宗","朱亞虎","蔡壁如","張哲陽"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0021","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":6195,"summary":"本段內容為法庭辯論，重點在於分析沈慶京捐款與京華城案之間的關聯。控方主張柯文哲與沈慶京於109年2月20日密會後，在一個半月內完成了從密會、提供協助、透過人頭捐款到李文宗回覆「市長和我們都心存感激」的過程，認為李文宗已向柯文哲報告。而柯文哲則抗辯在密會中未提及京華城案，且秘書、基層公務員及李文宗均未將相關資訊告知，主張其對此不知情。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0021.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0021.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0021","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0021/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0021/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0021/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}