{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0032.txt","chunk_index":32,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄（含蔡明星、範尤偉、黃彥人、周芳如、譚仲明之證詞）","工作簿"],"end_seconds":9740,"keywords":["募款","工作簿","聯絡視窗","贊助經費","辦公室開辦"],"legal_issues":["募款過程是否存在暗示或要求贊助之行為","工作簿款項記載之真實性與對象認定","款項來源與實際交付之關聯性"],"legal_issues_raw":["工作簿款項記載之真實性與對象認定","募款過程是否存在暗示或要求贊助之行為","款項來源與實際交付之關聯性"],"participants":["周芳如","柯文哲","範尤偉","蔡明星","譚仲明","黃彥人"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","蔡明星","範尤偉","黃彥人","周芳如","譚仲明"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0032","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":9440,"summary":"本段內容主要分析柯文哲工作簿中款項記載的來源與性質。首先討論蔡明星之款項，指出範尤偉作為蔡明星的會計師，扮演柯文哲與蔡明星之間的聯絡視窗，因此款項雖由範尤偉交付，但可能因其關聯性而記在蔡明星名下。其次討論黃彥人之款項，該筆款項用途標記為「辦公室開辦」，經辦人為譚仲明，但金額空白。根據周芳如與黃彥人的證詞，當時周芳如曾主動提及辦公室裝潢經費需求，雖黃彥人表示會再看看，但最終經由譚仲明確認，黃彥人並未實際提供贊助經費。","video_id":"0KeURwJSR_Q","raw_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/raw/chunk_0032.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/0KeURwJSR_Q/cleaned/chunk_0032.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0032","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0032/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0032/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/0KeURwJSR_Q:chunk_0032/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/0KeURwJSR_Q","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}