{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0002.txt","chunk_index":2,"documents_referenced":["113年台北市議會調查報告/紀錄","局長室公文記錄"],"end_seconds":890,"keywords":["京華城案","依法行政","審議","文官尊嚴","研議","都委會","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["京華城案是否由柯文哲列管並介入指示","公務員是否涉嫌圖利特定廠商（富邦/富邦相關對象）","行政程序是否符合依法行政原則","都市計畫變更程序中「研議」與「審議」之法律效力區分"],"legal_issues_raw":["京華城案是否由柯文哲列管並介入指示","都市計畫變更程序中「研議」與「審議」之法律效力區分","公務員是否涉嫌圖利特定廠商（富邦/富邦相關對象）","行政程序是否符合依法行政原則"],"participants":["林作品","林俊賢","柯文哲","法官","證人/被告"],"participants_raw":["證人/被告（前都市發展局長）","林作品（證人）","柯文哲（被告/前台北柯文哲）","林俊賢（檢察官）","法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0002","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":590,"summary":"本段逐字稿為一名曾任台北市政府都市發展局長的證人（或被告）之陳述。其主要內容包含：反駁林作品關於京華城案由柯文哲市長列管並要求報告的說法；陳述其個人專業背景與公務生涯，強調其依法行政且無圖利之意；說明其在市議會調查及檢方偵查期間堅持不認罪以捍衛文官尊嚴；並針對「研議」與「審議」在都市計畫程序上的法律定義差異進行說明。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0002.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0002.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0002","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0002/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0002/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0002/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}