{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0003.txt","chunk_index":3,"documents_referenced":["內政部營建署（現國土署）99年6月17日函釋","相關證人（邵琇珮、張立立、楊氏盛、胡芳瓊）之證詞","都市計畫法第二十四條","京華城案都市計畫修正草案"],"end_seconds":1185,"keywords":["京華城","國土署","容積獎勵","都委會","都市計畫變更","都發局"],"legal_issues":["以都市計畫變更方式核給容積獎勵之合法性","容積獎勵是否必須經過主要計畫授權","是否涉及施壓公務員或指示違法推進計畫","是否違反都市計畫法及相關行政程序"],"legal_issues_raw":["以都市計畫變更方式核給容積獎勵之合法性","是否違反都市計畫法及相關行政程序","是否涉及施壓公務員或指示違法推進計畫","容積獎勵是否必須經過主要計畫授權"],"participants":["廖","張立立","楊氏盛","發言者","胡芳瓊","辯護人","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["被告（發言者）","辯護人","廖檢察官（被提及）","邵琇珮（證人）","張立立（證人）","楊氏盛（證人）","胡芳瓊（證人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0003","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":885,"summary":"被告針對京華城案之都市計畫變更程序進行辯護，主張以都市計畫變更方式核給容積獎勵在法令上可行且為實務常態，並否認對都發局施壓或指示違法，認為檢察官對相關法令（如國土署函釋）有誤解。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0003.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0003.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0003","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0003/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0003/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0003/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}