{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0004.txt","chunk_index":4,"documents_referenced":["109年10月11日都市規劃單位簽呈","109年10月12日專家學者座談會會議紀錄","監察院105年調查報告及決定案文","西部計畫修正案","起訴書"],"end_seconds":1480,"keywords":["公展","容積獎勵","行政程序","都委會","都市更新","都市計畫法第24條","都發局"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之申請是否符合公益性與貢獻度之對照關係","是否涉嫌利用職權施壓下屬（針對起訴書中提及之議員壓力）","行政程序是否違法（是否跳過必要審查直接公展）","都市計畫法第24條與都市更新條例之適用爭議（容積獎勵之法源依據）"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵之申請是否符合公益性與貢獻度之對照關係","行政程序是否違法（是否跳過必要審查直接公展）","是否涉嫌利用職權施壓下屬（針對起訴書中提及之議員壓力）","都市計畫法第24條與都市更新條例之適用爭議（容積獎勵之法源依據）"],"participants":["劉秀玲","專家學者及都委會/都審會","應曉薇","楊日正（科長）","經華城公司（申請人）","邵琇珮","陳述人"],"participants_raw":["陳述人（原都發局長）","邵琇珮（都發局總工程師）","楊日正（科長）","劉秀玲（都委會前執行秘書）","應曉薇議員","經華城公司（申請人）","專家學者及都委會/都審會委員"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0004","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1180,"summary":"本段文字為被告針對起訴書內容之辯護陳述。重點在於說明「西部計畫」申請容積獎勵之審核流程，強調其在109年10月之公展程序是基於刑事要件齊備且經過專家學者座談會討論後之合法行政程序，否認因議員壓力而強迫下屬加速辦理，並針對起訴書指稱其無視公務員對都市更新法規適用之疑慮、違法取得容積獎勵等指控進行反駁。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0004.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0004.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0004","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0004/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0004/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0004/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}