{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0005.txt","chunk_index":5,"documents_referenced":["109年127號都更處簽呈公文","99年6月17日會議紀錄","《都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法》","《都市更新條例》","《都市計畫法》第24條","臺北大學特定區計畫土地使用分析管制要點"],"end_seconds":1775,"keywords":["容積獎勵","實績獎勵","建法城案","準用","規模獎勵","都市更新","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["《都市計畫法》第24條與《都市更新條例》之適用區分","實績獎勵與規模獎勵之適用條件","行政程序中「準用」規範之定義與範圍（針對《都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法》）","都市更新計畫中容積獎勵之合法性與依據"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市更新計畫中容積獎勵之合法性與依據","實績獎勵與規模獎勵之適用條件","《都市計畫法》第24條與《都市更新條例》之適用區分","行政程序中「準用」規範之定義與範圍（針對《都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法》）"],"participants":["劉一三","劉秀玲","簡安官（被指控之對象/指控人）","邵琇珮","陳志明","陳述者"],"participants_raw":["陳述者（前營建署相關人員/被告）","簡安官（被指控之對象/指控人）","邵琇珮（證人）","劉秀玲（證人）","劉一三（專家委員）","陳志明（相關人員）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0005","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1475,"summary":"本段文字為被告或相關人員之陳述，旨在反駁簡安官之指控，並針對都市更新計畫中容積獎勵的合法性、程序及準用規範進行說明。陳述者強調容積獎勵不必然僅限於特定法令，可透過都市更新計畫書及審議取得，並舉南港輪胎及臺北大學特定區為例，說明實績與規模獎勵之實務操作。針對建法城案，強調其非都更案而是依《都市計畫法》第24條辦理，且獎勵上限（20%）低於都更區（50%），並澄清「準用」之對象為《都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法》而非《都更條例》，最後針對專家學者會議之支持程度提出反駁。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0005.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0005.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0005","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0005/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0005/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0005/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}