{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["109年11月17日公開展覽書","114年6月3日臺北建管處補充理由書","CP計畫變更內容（7834）","形式答辯狀","監察院105年調查報告及糾正案","辯論狀"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["價值判斷","圖利罪","實質審查","對價性","形式審查","都化局","都委會","都市計畫變更"],"legal_issues":["缺乏對價性是否足以構成公務員圖利罪之犯罪要件","都化局之審查權限屬於「形式審查」或「實質審查」","都化局在都市計畫變更審查中，對於「對價性」與「公益性」是否具有實質審查義務"],"legal_issues_raw":["都化局在都市計畫變更審查中，對於「對價性」與「公益性」是否具有實質審查義務","都化局之審查權限屬於「形式審查」或「實質審查」","缺乏對價性是否足以構成公務員圖利罪之犯罪要件"],"participants":["檢察官（指控方）","證人（邵琇珮、張立立、楊智勝、劉秀玲）","辯方（發言者）","都化局（臺北市政府都市發展局）","都委會","京華城公司（申請人）","陳志明"],"participants_raw":["辯方（發言者）","京華城公司（申請人）","都化局（臺北市政府都市發展局）","都委會（臺北市都市計畫委員會）","檢察官（指控方）","證人（邵琇珮、張立立、楊智勝、劉秀玲）","陳志明（秘書長）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"本段文字為被告方針對臺北市都化局在都市計畫變更案中，是否應就「對價性」進行實質審查之辯論。辯方主張對價性涉及價值判斷，應由都委會審議而非都化局認定；都化局在公展前的審查僅為形式要件審查，實質內容應由申請人（京華城公司）向都委會說明。針對檢方指控都化局未主動試算或說明對價性而違法，辯方認為檢方誤認審理主體，且即便缺乏對價性亦不構成圖利罪。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}