{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["105年糾正案文","105年調查報告","109年4月6日簽呈","市民陳情案件交辦單","都市更新事業計畫"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["公開聽證","原意意見","京華城","職權審查","都委會","都市更新","都發局"],"legal_issues":["將案件送交都委會審議是否構成違法","是否與他人有犯意聯絡共同違法","職權責任之歸屬（卸任前之簽報與卸任後之審議）」","都市更新事業計畫之審查程序是否合法"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否與他人有犯意聯絡共同違法","將案件送交都委會審議是否構成違法","都市更新事業計畫之審查程序是否合法","職權責任之歸屬（卸任前之簽報與卸任後之審議）」"],"participants":["前都發局長（陳述人）","吳馨修","彭振聲","徐部長","柯文哲","黃玉品"],"participants_raw":["前都發局長（陳述人）","柯文哲","彭振聲","徐部長","吳馨修（組長/都發中心執行長）","黃玉品（繼任都發局長）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"被告（前都發局長）針對京華城案進行辯護，主張其任職期間（107年12月至110年12月）僅處理初步審查及簽送都委會程序，並強調其卸任後才進入正式審議階段。其主張都發局係依據105年調查報告及糾正案文進行審查，且送交都委會之目的在於透過公開聽證會凝聚意見，並無違法之意，且與京華城公司人員並不相識。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}