{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0009.txt","chunk_index":9,"documents_referenced":["107年臺北市政府都發局施政重點及施政計畫（韌性城市、智慧城市、宜居城市）","地檢署偵查期間之傳訊紀錄","監察院105年調查報告及糾正案","都市更新條例第二十四條"],"end_seconds":2955,"keywords":["京華城","偽證","容積獎勵","都市更新條例","都發局","韌性城市"],"legal_issues":["京華城都市更新案之容積獎勵是否違反法律","容積率是否超過560%之違法爭議","準用《都市更新條例》第24條取得容積獎勵之合法性","證人萬林哲平之證詞是否構成偽證"],"legal_issues_raw":["京華城都市更新案之容積獎勵是否違反法律","準用《都市更新條例》第24條取得容積獎勵之合法性","證人萬林哲平之證詞是否構成偽證","容積率是否超過560%之違法爭議"],"participants":["受命","審判長","發言人","許律師（黃景茂之辯護人）","陪席"],"participants_raw":["發言人（被告或其代理人）","審判長","受命法官","陪席法官","許律師（黃景茂之辯護人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0009","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2655,"summary":"本段逐字稿為法庭辯論紀錄。發言者針對京華城都市更新案的容積獎勵合法性進行辯護，主張其依據都發局之韌性、智慧、宜居城市計畫及都更條例第24條辦理，並非違法。同時，發言者對證人萬林哲平的證詞提出強烈質疑，認為其指稱都發局內部反對準用都更條例之說法為偽證，並列舉多位都發局同仁之證詞以證明程序合法。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0009.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0009.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0009","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0009/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0009/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0009/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}