{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0014.txt","chunk_index":14,"documents_referenced":["104年10月15日、104年10月5日(676)、105年10月13日(698)、105年6月15日(689)之相關文件","林俊敏提交之變更說明/公文","監察院糾正文/調查報告","臺北市政府陳情注意事項","都市計畫法第227條第一項第三款"],"end_seconds":4430,"keywords":["京華城","容積率","對價關係","監察院","訴訟期間","都市計畫變更","陳情"],"legal_issues":["公務員在處理都市計畫變更時是否盡到實質審查義務","監察院糾正文與刑事起訴標準之關聯性","訴訟期間受理陳情是否違反行政程序或相關注意事項","都市計畫變更（容積率由392調至560）是否涉及對價關係或圖利業者"],"legal_issues_raw":["訴訟期間受理陳情是否違反行政程序或相關注意事項","都市計畫變更（容積率由392調至560）是否涉及對價關係或圖利業者","公務員在處理都市計畫變更時是否盡到實質審查義務","監察院糾正文與刑事起訴標準之關聯性"],"participants":["彭振聲","林俊敏","林欽榮","柯文哲","檢察官","發言者（律師或辯方）","監察官","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["發言者（律師或辯方）","林欽榮","林俊敏","柯文哲","彭振聲","黃景茂","檢察官","監察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0014","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":4130,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案中，關於林欽榮（及林俊敏）在處理陳情案件時的程序正義、是否違反陳情注意事項（如訴訟期間不得受理），以及在都市計畫變更過程中是否存在協助業者（如將容積從392提高至560）而缺乏對價關係之質疑。辯方或發言者質疑為何彭振聲、黃景茂被起訴，而林欽榮在同樣有加速處理意圖且涉及訴訟期間陳情的情況下卻未被起訴。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0014.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0014.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0014","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0014/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0014/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0014/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}