{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0015.txt","chunk_index":15,"documents_referenced":["107 年都市計畫修正案","民事訴訟法第 249 條第 2 項","監察院報告","都市計畫法第 24 條"],"end_seconds":4725,"keywords":["京華城案","個案變更","公展","容積率","瀆職罪","行政要件","都委會","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公務人員是否違反職務上之義務而構成瀆職罪","民事訴訟法第 249 條第 2 項關於駁回之訴之適用（作為類比說明）","都市計畫法第 24 條關於個案變更之權利行使","都發局與都委會在都市計畫變更申請中的權責分工（形式審查 vs. 實質審查）"],"legal_issues_raw":["都發局與都委會在都市計畫變更申請中的權責分工（形式審查 vs. 實質審查）","公務人員是否違反職務上之義務而構成瀆職罪","都市計畫法第 24 條關於個案變更之權利行使","民事訴訟法第 249 條第 2 項關於駁回之訴之適用（作為類比說明）"],"participants":["劉秀玲","林志瑜","楊智勝","發言人（律師或辯方）","胡芳雄","邵琇珮","陳志明"],"participants_raw":["發言人（律師或辯方）","邵琇珮","劉秀玲","胡芳雄","楊智勝","陳志明","林志瑜"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0015","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":4425,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案中，都發局公務員在處理都市計畫變更申請時的權責分工。辯方主張，都發局僅負責行政要件的形式審查，而關於容積率、使用強度等實質合理性與合法性的審查權限在於都委會。多位公務員（如邵琇珮、劉秀玲、胡芳雄、楊智勝、陳志明等）之證詞均傾向認為，只要行政要件完備，都發局應將案件送審都委會，而非由都發局先行攔截或實質審查，因此質疑都發局人員被指控瀆職之合理性。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0015.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0015.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0015","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0015/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0015/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0015/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}