{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0016.txt","chunk_index":16,"documents_referenced":["107年公務局事實上報告書","內政部營建署報告","監察院報告","都市更新獎勵容積辦法","都市計畫法第二十四條"],"end_seconds":5020,"keywords":["京華城案","容積獎勵","法律保留原則","都市更新","都市計畫法","類推適用"],"legal_issues":["《都市計畫法》第24條之適用與個案變更之權利","容積獎勵之公平性與合法性認定","行政行為是否違反法律保留原則與重要性原則","非都更案件是否可類推適用或準用「都市更新」之獎勵容積標準"],"legal_issues_raw":["《都市計畫法》第24條之適用與個案變更之權利","非都更案件是否可類推適用或準用「都市更新」之獎勵容積標準","行政行為是否違反法律保留原則與重要性原則","容積獎勵之公平性與合法性認定"],"participants":["劉秀玲","嚴邦隊","張立立","李德權","林洲民","楊智勝","胡芳瓊","邵琇珮","郭泰奇"],"participants_raw":["邵琇珮","胡芳瓊","李德權","劉秀玲","郭泰奇","張立立","楊智勝","嚴邦隊","林洲民"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0016","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":4720,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案中，關於依據《都市計畫法》第24條申請容積獎勵的合法性爭議。多位公務人員（如胡芳瓊、劉秀玲、楊智勝等）均主張申請程序合法且有法律依據。爭議焦點在於是否違法「準用」都市更新的獎勵容積標準給予非都更案件，以及此舉是否違反法律保留原則與重要性原則。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0016.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0016.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0016","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0016/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0016/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0016/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}