{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0019.txt","chunk_index":19,"documents_referenced":["協議書（111年11月6日簽署）","容積獎勵條例","計畫書（含步行穿越室內空間最佳化等修正內容）","都市更新條例第二十四條","都發局/都委會會議紀錄（12/2, 2/16, 3/18, 4/21, 7/1, 111年9/9等）"],"end_seconds":5905,"keywords":["京華城案","住都中心","因果關係","容積獎勵","滾動式修正","都委會","都發局"],"legal_issues":["因果關係之認定（辯方主張禁止條件式的因果關係）","本案性質是否屬於「都更案件」之法律認定","行政程序之合法性（都市更新條例第24條之適用）","被告是否在離職後仍對都發局及都委會之決議具有影響力"],"legal_issues_raw":["因果關係之認定（辯方主張禁止條件式的因果關係）","被告是否在離職後仍對都發局及都委會之決議具有影響力","本案性質是否屬於「都更案件」之法律認定","行政程序之合法性（都市更新條例第24條之適用）"],"participants":["徐國勇","柯文哲","檢察官","邵琇珮","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["黃景茂（被告/前都發局長）","檢察官","徐國勇（證人/內政部長）","邵琇珮（證人/教授）","柯文哲（提及之人物）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0019","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5605,"summary":"本段文字為辯方針對被告黃景茂在京華城案中之責任進行辯護。重點在於證明黃景茂在都發局關鍵決議及協議書簽署期間已離職（轉任住都中心執行長），且與後續參與審議的專家（如徐國勇、邵琇珮）無私下勾結或影響之事實。同時，引用專家邵琇珮之證詞，主張本案性質與都更案件不同，採滾動式修正，不應將其視為都更案件處理。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0019.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0019.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0019","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0019/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0019/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0019/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}