{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["113年11月16日林洲民提交之便箋（106年報告內容）","監察院議旨","臺北市政府內規（關於釐清重大爭議之研議流程）","處理人民陳情案件注意事項","行政法院判決"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["京華城（隱含）","公務員信心危機","公展","研議","行政程序","認罪","都委會","都發局"],"legal_issues":["偵查與起訴標準是否一致（質疑文字遊戲）","公展程序是否符合監察院議旨及行政法院判決","被告是否構成違法之認定","都發局將案件送研議是否符合內部規定（釐清重大爭議）"],"legal_issues_raw":["被告是否構成違法之認定","都發局將案件送研議是否符合內部規定（釐清重大爭議）","公展程序是否符合監察院議旨及行政法院判決","偵查與起訴標準是否一致（質疑文字遊戲）"],"participants":["彭振聲","林洲民","林欽榮","柯文哲","辯護律師（發言者）","邵琇珮","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","黃景茂（被告）","彭振聲（被告/提及）","邵琇珮（被告/提及）","柯文哲（柯文哲/提及）","林洲民（提及）","林欽榮（提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"本段逐字稿為辯護方針對被告黃景茂之陳述，主張其在任都發局長期間之處理程序符合內規及行政邏輯。文中對比了彭振聲、邵琇珮之認罪情況，質疑其認罪之實質意義，並強調黃景茂不認罪之理由在於缺乏明確罪名且其行為係基於釐清重大爭議之善良出發點，同時表達對公務員因本案而產生信心危機之憂慮。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}