{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0022.txt","chunk_index":22,"documents_referenced":["九月二號廉政官訊問筆錄","事業及財務計畫書","十二月十九號偵查筆錄","都市計畫法第二十四條"],"end_seconds":6790,"keywords":["偵查與審理差異","偽證","公益回饋","容積率","新華城","林洲民","都市計畫法第24條"],"legal_issues":["《都市計畫法》第24條之適用性（是否可作為容積獎勵之依據）","公務員是否受上級強迫違法執行職務","行政程序之合法性（容積率從56%提升至84%之合法性）","證人於偵查與審理階段之證詞矛盾（涉嫌偽證罪）"],"legal_issues_raw":["《都市計畫法》第24條之適用性（是否可作為容積獎勵之依據）","證人於偵查與審理階段之證詞矛盾（涉嫌偽證罪）","行政程序之合法性（容積率從56%提升至84%之合法性）","公務員是否受上級強迫違法執行職務"],"participants":["其他公務員","彭振聲","林洲民","柯文哲","發言者","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["發言者（可能是檢察官或律師）","林洲民（前都發局局長，證人）","柯文哲（前柯文哲，被提及）","彭振聲（前副柯文哲，被提及）","黃景茂（前都發局局長，被提及）","其他公務員（邵琇珮、劉秀玲、胡芳雄、郭太祈、楊智正、嚴邦淚等，被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0022","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":6490,"summary":"本段逐字稿為一名法律人員或檢方對證人林洲民（前都發局局長）之證詞前後矛盾之質詢。重點在於林洲民在偵查階段與法院審理階段，針對《都市計畫法》第24條是否能作為容積獎勵依據、公益回饋戶數、以及同僚對本案之看法等關鍵事實，採取截然不同的說法，質疑其涉嫌偽證並誤導偵查方向，導致柯文哲、彭振聲、黃景茂被指控強行貫徹個人意志要求公務員配合。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0022.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0022.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0022","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0022/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0022/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0022/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}