{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0023.txt","chunk_index":23,"documents_referenced":["《都市計畫法》第 24 條","《都市計畫法》第 27 條第一項第三款","林周敏給柯文哲的手札","檢察官論告書","監察院糾正案文"],"end_seconds":7085,"keywords":["不作為犯","京華城案","圖利罪","基礎容積率","監察院糾正","都委會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["圖利罪之認定及被告範圍之劃定（關於不作為犯與會議決議之責任歸屬）","基礎容積率從 392% 變更為 560% 的法律依據是否正當","行政程序是否違法（程序正義問題）","適用《都市計畫法》第 27 條第一項第三款（國防或經濟發展需求）之正當性"],"legal_issues_raw":["基礎容積率從 392% 變更為 560% 的法律依據是否正當","適用《都市計畫法》第 27 條第一項第三款（國防或經濟發展需求）之正當性","行政程序是否違法（程序正義問題）","圖利罪之認定及被告範圍之劃定（關於不作為犯與會議決議之責任歸屬）"],"participants":["彭振聲","李德權","林周敏","林欽榮","柯文哲","王道會","發言者（未具名，推測為辯方律師或相關法律代理人）","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["發言者（未具名，推測為辯方律師或相關法律代理人）","林周敏（提及）","林欽榮（提及）","柯文哲（提及）","彭振聲（提及）","黃景茂（提及）","李德權（提及）","王道會（提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0023","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":6785,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案中關於基礎容積率從 392% 調整至 560% 的合法性爭議。發言者質疑林周敏、林欽榮等人在處理容積率調整時，雖認同 560% 為正確基礎容積，但其採用的法律依據（《都市計畫法》第 27 條第一項第三款關於國防或經濟發展需求）缺乏實質理由，認為程序違法。此外，發言者針對檢方起訴範圍提出質疑，認為若以「不作為」或會議決議為圖利依據，應有更多參與會議的公務員及都委會委員被列為被告，而非僅限於特定少數人。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0023.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0023.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0023","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0023/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0023/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0023/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}