{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["內政部九十九年函令","大眾捷運法","都市計畫法","都更容獎辦法"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["圖利罪","容積獎勵","細部計畫變更","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["是否構成圖利罪之構成要件","都市計畫法第二十四條以細部計畫變更方式核給容積獎勵之合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫法第二十四條以細部計畫變更方式核給容積獎勵之合法性","是否構成圖利罪之構成要件"],"participants":["庭上","林冠安律師"],"participants_raw":["林冠安律師","庭上（法官）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"辯方律師林冠安針對都市計畫法第二十四條之容積獎勵核給合法性提出辯論，主張透過細部計畫變更核給容積獎勵具有法律依據，並引用內政部函令及公務員證詞說明獲取容積獎勵的兩種途徑，旨在反駁圖利罪之指控。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}