{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0030.txt","chunk_index":30,"documents_referenced":["內政部函釋","方案四（研議意見）","都市計畫法第二十四條","都更條例","都更獎勵辦法"],"end_seconds":9150,"keywords":["主要計畫","容積獎勵","細部計畫","都市計畫委員會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之法律依據是否可單純依據《都市計畫法》第二十四條及細部計畫變更而定","細部計畫定容積獎勵是否必須經過主要計畫之授權","都更獎勵辦法之專案是否可參照適用於非都更之細部計畫案件"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵之法律依據是否可單純依據《都市計畫法》第二十四條及細部計畫變更而定","細部計畫定容積獎勵是否必須經過主要計畫之授權","都更獎勵辦法之專案是否可參照適用於非都更之細部計畫案件"],"participants":["合議庭","張立立（專委）","李德權","楊智勝（科長）","檢察官","邵琇珮","陳志明"],"participants_raw":["邵琇珮（總工程師）","張立立（專委）","楊智勝（科長）","李德權（副秘書長/證人）","陳志明（副秘書長）","合議庭（審判長）","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0030","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8850,"summary":"本段文字主要針對都市計畫中「容積獎勵」的法律依據進行辯論。辯方主張容積獎勵可透過「都市計畫法第二十四條」及「細部計畫變更」之途徑達成，無需必然依賴主要計畫之授權。文中引用多位證人（邵琇珮、張立立、楊智勝、李德權、陳志明）之證詞及內政部函釋，反駁檢方關於必須經由主要計畫授權之主張，並質疑檢方所強調之「方案四」僅為法律條文之重複陳述，缺乏實質內容。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0030.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0030.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0030","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0030/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0030/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0030/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}