{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0032.txt","chunk_index":32,"documents_referenced":["土管條例","都市計畫法（特別是第22條、第24條）","都更條例"],"end_seconds":9740,"keywords":["主要計畫","土地使用分區管制","地方自治","容積獎勵","細部計畫","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["個案容積獎勵與通案之關係","容積獎勵之訂定權限應屬於主要計畫或細部計畫","細部計畫訂定容積獎勵是否需經過主要計畫授權","都市計畫法第22條及第24條之適用與解釋"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵之訂定權限應屬於主要計畫或細部計畫","細部計畫訂定容積獎勵是否需經過主要計畫授權","都市計畫法第22條及第24條之適用與解釋","個案容積獎勵與通案之關係"],"participants":["張立立","李德權","楊智盛","檢察官","胡芳瓊","辯方律師（發言者）","邵琇珮","陳志明"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師（發言者）","陳志明（秘書長，證人）","張立立（專門委員，證人）","楊智盛（科長，證人）","邵琇珮（總工程師，證人）","胡芳瓊（被告/證人）","李德權（證人）","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0032","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":9440,"summary":"辯方針對都市計畫法中「主要計畫」與「細部計畫」的分工進行說明，主張容積獎勵之訂定屬於細部計畫之權限，無需主要計畫授權。辯方批評檢方對都市計畫法體系存在誤解，且其主張將侵犯地方自治權，並引用證人證詞說明都市計畫之通案通常是由個案累積而來。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0032.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0032.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0032","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0032/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0032/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0032/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}