{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0035.txt","chunk_index":35,"documents_referenced":["監察院糾正意旨","都市計畫法第23條","都市計畫法第24條","都市計畫法第27條","都規科簽呈"],"end_seconds":10625,"keywords":["公展","容積獎勵","形式要件","京華城案","細部計畫","都委會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["依據《都市計畫法》第24條變更細部計畫給予容積獎勵之合法性","公展程序之必要性與審查標準","都發局在都市計畫變更程序中之權限（形式審查 vs 實質審查）","都發局是否具備駁回申請案之權限"],"legal_issues_raw":["依據《都市計畫法》第24條變更細部計畫給予容積獎勵之合法性","都發局在都市計畫變更程序中之權限（形式審查 vs 實質審查）","公展程序之必要性與審查標準","都發局是否具備駁回申請案之權限"],"participants":["嚴邦瑞","李德權","楊智晟(都規科科長)","辯方律師","邵琇珮","陳志明","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","黃景茂 (都發局局長)","陳志明","李德權","嚴邦瑞","邵琇珮","楊智晟 (都規科科長)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0035","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":10325,"summary":"辯方針對京華城案之都市計畫變更程序進行辯護，主張依據《都市計畫法》第24條，以變更細部計畫方式給予容積獎勵屬合法且有先例之實務做法。針對檢方指控，辯方強調都發局僅負責形式審查，不具實質駁回權，應將計畫送交都委會審議。此外，提及都規科原認可公展，而黃景茂局長要求補充公益性證明，證明並非單純護航，且召開專家諮詢會議係基於專業幕僚建議。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0035.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0035.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0035","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0035/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0035/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0035/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}