{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0037.txt","chunk_index":37,"documents_referenced":["105年糾正案文","《臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例》第七條","公展簽呈","京華城都市計畫變更草案（第二版）"],"end_seconds":11215,"keywords":["公展","圖利罪","京華城","都委會","都市計畫變更","都發局","體系解釋"],"legal_issues":["《臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例》第七條關於「計畫不當」與「有礙公共利益」之法律解釋","公務員執行職務是否受上級壓力干預（行政程序之合法性）","是否構成圖利罪","都發局與都委會之審查權限劃分"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成圖利罪","《臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例》第七條關於「計畫不當」與「有礙公共利益」之法律解釋","都發局與都委會之審查權限劃分","公務員執行職務是否受上級壓力干預（行政程序之合法性）"],"participants":["劉秀玲","張立立","李德權","林之宇","檢察官","辯護律師","邵琇珮","陳志明","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","黃景茂（被告）","檢察官","張立立（證人）","陳志明（證人）","李德權（證人）","林之宇（證人）","邵琇珮（證人）","劉秀玲（證人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0037","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":10915,"summary":"辯方針對黃景茂被指控圖利京華城一案進行辯護。主張都市計畫變更之參考結構並非實質對價，且無圖利意圖。針對《臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例》第七條之解釋，認為都發局之審查權限應基於體系解釋，且京華城重建對周邊安全性與市容有助益，不構成計畫不當或有礙公共利益。此外，強調都發局內部承辦人員（如張立立、林之宇、邵琇珮等）均認同公展程序合法，且黃景茂並未對公務員施壓壓縮審查時間，公務員係基於專業判斷決定公展。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0037.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0037.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0037","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0037/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0037/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0037/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}