{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0040.txt","chunk_index":40,"documents_referenced":["公文"],"end_seconds":12100,"keywords":["公務員","圖利罪","容積獎勵","無罪判決","都委會","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公務員執行職務之責任界限","圖利罪之主觀認定（是否明知違法）","容積獎勵審核程序之法律責任"],"legal_issues_raw":["圖利罪之主觀認定（是否明知違法）","公務員執行職務之責任界限","容積獎勵審核程序之法律責任"],"participants":["審判長","法官","辯護人","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","審判長","法官","被告黃景茂"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0040","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":11800,"summary":"辯護人針對被告黃景茂（都發局相關人員）之責任進行辯論，主張其在都委會給予容積獎勵的過程中，並無明知違法之意圖，且其職務僅參與部分公文研議，未參與核心審議過程。辯護人強調應避免過於寬泛的圖利罪認定，以免導致公務員因恐懼而「躺平」，請求法院考量其資歷與貢獻，判決無罪。","video_id":"7SD1Ue5QAiE","raw_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/raw/chunk_0040.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/7SD1Ue5QAiE/cleaned/chunk_0040.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0040","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0040/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0040/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/7SD1Ue5QAiE:chunk_0040/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/7SD1Ue5QAiE","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}