{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["北市府新聞稿","柯文哲工作部帳冊","京華城公司分潤表","銀行帳戶提款紀錄"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["京華城","分潤","工作簿","現金提領","舉證責任","贈策"],"legal_issues":["工作簿之證據性質認定（帳冊性質）","被告之舉證責任（針對大額現金支出之憑證）","證據之證明力（口供與書面證據之對比）","資金流向之認定（1,600萬現金提領與1,500萬帳冊記載之關聯）"],"legal_issues_raw":["資金流向之認定（1,600萬現金提領與1,500萬帳冊記載之關聯）","證據之證明力（口供與書面證據之對比）","被告之舉證責任（針對大額現金支出之憑證）","工作簿之證據性質認定（帳冊性質）"],"participants":["吳採仙","徐文心","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京"],"participants_raw":["沈慶京","柯文哲","吳採仙","徐文心","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"本段內容主要討論關於京華城案中，沈慶京於9月至10月間提領1,600萬元現金，及其與柯文哲工作簿中記載之「小省1,500萬」之關聯性。檢方主張該筆現金可用於支付該筆款項，而被告方雖主張其中250萬元交予徐文心，但因缺乏借據及帳單證明，被認為證據不足，無法推翻檢方之認定。","video_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","raw_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/9JyOZ5CWGz4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}