{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["工作部帳冊","最高法院判決（關於對價關係之認定）","監察院糾正案"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["京華城案","圖利","容積獎勵","審計金","對價關係","工作部"],"legal_issues":["工作部帳冊之證據能力與認定","收受審計金是否構成對價關係","是否涉嫌圖利京華城公司","職務行為與獲利之關聯性（對價性）"],"legal_issues_raw":["收受審計金是否構成對價關係","是否涉嫌圖利京華城公司","工作部帳冊之證據能力與認定","職務行為與獲利之關聯性（對價性）"],"participants":["柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","法官"],"participants_raw":["檢察官","柯文哲","沈慶京","法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"檢方主張柯文哲市長之「工作部」帳冊為證明金流之關鍵證據，記載其收受沈慶京（京華城案相關人士）一千五百萬元之審計金。檢方認為該筆款項與京華城案獲取違法容積獎勵及建造執照之時間點重疊，具有對價關係，涉嫌圖利京華城公司，並反駁柯文哲關於捐款之辯解。","video_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","raw_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/9JyOZ5CWGz4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}