{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0010.txt","chunk_index":10,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄（黃珊珊之供述）","對話紀錄（黃珊珊與李文宗、黃珊珊與柯文哲之訊息）"],"end_seconds":3250,"keywords":["募款委員會","審計金","微經小審","捐款","時序認定"],"legal_issues":["募款委員會之召開目的與執行過程之認定","被告陳述與證人供述之矛盾之分析","關於「微經小審已給過」之文字認定（是指捐款或建議）"],"legal_issues_raw":["關於「微經小審已給過」之文字認定（是指捐款或建議）","募款委員會之召開目的與執行過程之認定","被告陳述與證人供述之矛盾之分析"],"participants":["李文宗","柯文哲","邱佩玲","黃珊珊"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","黃珊珊","李文宗","邱佩玲"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0010","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2950,"summary":"本段內容分析關於柯文哲要求召開募款委員會及後續與黃珊珊對話之時序與認定。重點在於討論 112 年 10 月至 11 月間，黃珊珊與李文宗協調召開募款委員會，以及柯文哲對「審計金（微經小審）」已給過的回覆。檢方/法官針對柯文哲辯稱該詞是指「給予建議」與黃珊珊理解為「已捐款」之差異進行比對，並認定該對話是指涉 1500 萬元之捐款認定。","video_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","raw_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/raw/chunk_0010.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/cleaned/chunk_0010.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0010","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0010/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0010/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0010/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/9JyOZ5CWGz4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}