{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0019.txt","chunk_index":19,"documents_referenced":["110年1月6日協調會紀錄","吳順民與蔡麗蕊之通訊對話截圖","應曉薇之行事曆","都委會發文檔案","都委會第七七五次會議開會通知及議程","京華城公告公展文件（109年11月17日至12月16日）"],"end_seconds":5905,"keywords":["京華城","公告公展","應曉薇","程序違法","請託","都委會"],"legal_issues":["行政程序違法（公展期間即排定審議會議，未留陳情處理時間）","請託與權力介入（議員要求公務員將特定案件優先排入會議）","都委會審議程序之正當性"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政程序違法（公展期間即排定審議會議，未留陳情處理時間）","請託與權力介入（議員要求公務員將特定案件優先排入會議）","都委會審議程序之正當性"],"participants":["劉秀玲","吳順民","嚴邦瑞","應曉薇","蔡麗蕊","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇（議員）","吳順民（應曉薇之顧問/相關人員）","蔡麗蕊","劉秀玲","邵琇珮","嚴邦瑞"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0019","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5605,"summary":"本段逐字稿討論京華城方案四在109年12月24日進入都委會審議的過程。重點在於揭露該案在公告公展尚未結束前，即由應曉薇議員透過其顧問及相關人員（如蔡麗蕊、劉秀玲）施壓，要求將案件強行排入年底大會。儘管程序上應在公展結束後留有陳情處理時間，但該案在應曉薇的催促下快速排會，且在110年初迅速召開協調會，顯示該案審理過程存在異常急促且涉嫌請託之情況。","video_id":"9JyOZ5CWGz4","raw_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/raw/chunk_0019.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/9JyOZ5CWGz4/cleaned/chunk_0019.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0019","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0019/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0019/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/9JyOZ5CWGz4:chunk_0019/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/9JyOZ5CWGz4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}