{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["土地使用分區管制規則","最高行政法院108年度上字第6號判決","臺北市綠建築自治條例","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例第25條","都市更新條例","都市計畫審議原則第8條","都市計畫法施行細則","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["主要計畫","容積獎勵","智慧城市","綠建築","都市更新條例","都市計畫","金華廣場","非都更地區"],"legal_issues":["容積率與容積獎勵之法律定義區分","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例第25條之適用主體（市政府 vs. 民眾申請）","都市計畫容積率之訂定是否須受主要計畫之拘束","非都更地區是否可準用《都市更新條例》之容積獎勵標準"],"legal_issues_raw":["臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例第25條之適用主體（市政府 vs. 民眾申請）","都市計畫容積率之訂定是否須受主要計畫之拘束","非都更地區是否可準用《都市更新條例》之容積獎勵標準","容積率與容積獎勵之法律定義區分"],"participants":["劉秀玲","審判長","蔡麗芮","蕭修佩","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","審判長","劉秀玲（都市計畫委員會幕僚小組執行秘書）","蔡麗芮","蕭修佩"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論被告（金華廣場公司）申請變更都市計畫以獲取容積獎勵之合法性。檢方（或原告）主張，容積獎勵應基於市政府主導之都市計畫或上位計畫（主要計畫）之授權，而非由人民依需求申請創設。且本案違法準用《都市更新條例》之容積獎勵標準，將僅適用於都更地區之獎勵（如綠建築、智慧建築、耐震設計）非法適用於非都更地區，構成特權之容積獎勵。","video_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","raw_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/CXKiBIamLC4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}