{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0012.txt","chunk_index":12,"documents_referenced":["108年9月23日市長會議簡報","被告提交之證據（證項30，關於成本費用之清單）","都管條例第80條之二","都計法第24條"],"end_seconds":3840,"keywords":["京華城","公平性","利益衡量","商通模式","回饋專案","容積獎勵","都管條例","都計法"],"legal_issues":["回饋金計算方式（商通模式 vs. 合理公式/大灣北段模式）之合法性與公平性","容積獎勵與回饋專案之價值衡量是否不成比例","是否違反《都管條例》第80條之二關於淨利益回饋之規定","行政機關在不同時間點（108年與109-111年）對同一案件認定標準不一之疑點"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵與回饋專案之價值衡量是否不成比例","回饋金計算方式（商通模式 vs. 合理公式/大灣北段模式）之合法性與公平性","行政機關在不同時間點（108年與109-111年）對同一案件認定標準不一之疑點","是否違反《都管條例》第80條之二關於淨利益回饋之規定"],"participants":["以德權","劉久林","張家文","彭振聲","提及之對象","柯文哲","殷小偉","發言人","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["發言人（可能是檢察官或原告律師）","被告（提及之對象）","張家文（被提及之證人/相關人）","以德權（被提及之證人）","柯文哲（被提及之柯文哲）","彭振聲（被提及之副柯文哲）","黃景茂（被提及之局長）","殷小偉（被提及之人物）","劉久林（被提及之人物）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0012","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3540,"summary":"本段逐字稿為法庭辯論過程，主要針對京華城案中容積獎勵與回饋專案的價值評估、計算方式及其公平性進行質詢。辯方或檢方指出，被告提交的成本計算包含不應計入的保證金，且回饋金額與容積獎勵價值（約120億元）相比存在巨大差距。同時，對比108年市府曾因公平性考量拒絕京華城以「商通」模式計算回饋金，質疑為何109年至111年市府立場轉變，同意其要求，質疑本案存在利益衡量瑕疵及程序疑慮。","video_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","raw_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/raw/chunk_0012.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/cleaned/chunk_0012.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0012","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0012/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0012/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0012/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/CXKiBIamLC4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}