{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0014.txt","chunk_index":14,"documents_referenced":["2 月 24 日都發局簽呈","陳俊源與朱亞虎之通訊訊息","黃景茂之「刑事例」紀錄"],"end_seconds":4430,"keywords":["不公開成會","京華城","和解","樓地板面積","行政訴訟","陳情"],"legal_issues":["不公開成會之合法性與目的","京華城專案之陳情與決策過程","行政訴訟之和解條件（關於樓地板面積之認定）","證據之關聯性（會面時間與成會時間之因果關係）"],"legal_issues_raw":["京華城專案之陳情與決策過程","不公開成會之合法性與目的","行政訴訟之和解條件（關於樓地板面積之認定）","證據之關聯性（會面時間與成會時間之因果關係）"],"participants":["吳順民","彭振聲","應曉薇","曾安石","朱亞虎","柯文哲","沈慶京","陳俊源","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","沈慶京","黃景茂","陳俊源","朱亞虎","曾安石","彭振聲","吳順民","應曉薇"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0014","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4130,"summary":"本段文字分析 2 月 18 日至 21 日間的一系列事件，旨在證明沈慶京於 2 月 20 日與柯文哲市長會面時，確實就京華城案進行陳情。證據包含黃景茂的「刑事例」紀錄、不公開成會的召開時間點，以及後續都發局關於行政訴訟和解的簽呈，用以反駁辯護人主張檢方證據不足的說法。","video_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","raw_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/raw/chunk_0014.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/cleaned/chunk_0014.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0014","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0014/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0014/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0014/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/CXKiBIamLC4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}