{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0017.txt","chunk_index":17,"documents_referenced":["109年3月10日市長便當會決議","北高行法院判決書（7月16日）","西部計畫第一版草案（109年8月19日）","都委會109年5月21日會議紀錄","都市規劃科簽呈（109年9月2日）","都發局縮帖（4月14日/15日）"],"end_seconds":5315,"keywords":["圖利","容積獎勵","京華城","行政訴訟","西部計畫","都委會","都市計畫變更"],"legal_issues":["圖利之嫌：市府在法院判決後仍採取補救措施是否涉嫌圖利京華城","行政程序正義：是否應以訴訟救濟取代行政研議變更都市計畫","都市計畫變更之合法性：西部計畫草案中容積獎勵之適用是否違法"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政程序正義：是否應以訴訟救濟取代行政研議變更都市計畫","圖利之嫌：市府在法院判決後仍採取補救措施是否涉嫌圖利京華城","都市計畫變更之合法性：西部計畫草案中容積獎勵之適用是否違法"],"participants":["彭振聲","李建輝（都市設計科人員）","檢察官","都委會","陳述人（律師或訴訟代理人）"],"participants_raw":["彭振聲（副柯文哲）","李建輝（都市設計科人員）","都委會委員","檢察官","陳述人（律師或訴訟代理人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0017","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5015,"summary":"本段逐字稿討論關於京華城案中，市府與都發局在處理容積獎勵（120284）爭議時的決策過程。重點在於內部縮帖曾建議應透過訴訟解決以避免圖利爭議，而非透過行政研議或變更都市計畫。儘管法院已判決京華城敗訴，但市府隨後仍推動西部計畫變更，引起關於程序正義及是否圖利的質疑，且都市設計科人員曾對該草案之容積獎勵提出疑慮。","video_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","raw_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/raw/chunk_0017.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/cleaned/chunk_0017.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0017","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0017/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0017/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0017/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/CXKiBIamLC4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}