{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["103年7月市政白皮書","10月26日之簽程（關於加速行政流程）","10月27日之公告公展簽程","《都市更新容積獎勵辦法》","《都市更新條例》","《都市計畫法》第 24 條","專家學者諮詢會議記錄"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["京華城","公平性","容積獎勵","行政流程","西部計畫","都市更新條例","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["是否應準用《都市更新容積獎勵辦法》或《都市更新條例》之公平性問題","是否適用《都市計畫法》第 24 條變更都市計畫以增列容積獎勵","行政法院判決後，市府是否仍有補救容積之必要","行政首長在已知爭議與法律風險下核准之責任"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否適用《都市計畫法》第 24 條變更都市計畫以增列容積獎勵","是否應準用《都市更新容積獎勵辦法》或《都市更新條例》之公平性問題","行政法院判決後，市府是否仍有補救容積之必要","行政首長在已知爭議與法律風險下核准之責任"],"participants":["彭振聲","李德權","林中明","柯文哲","楊智勝","苗博雅"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","彭振聲","李德權","楊智勝","苗博雅","林中明"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要分析柯文哲市長在京華城案中，對於容積獎勵申請之知情程度與決策過程。內容指出，儘管有簽呈明確提到該案是為了確保 120,840 坪樓地板面積而依《都市計畫法》第 24 條申請，且行政法院已判決市府勝訴無需補救，加上李德權副秘書長提醒應依《都市更新條例》一致性規定執行，以及多位議員與專家之反對意見，柯市長在已知該案涉及龐大利益、非都更地區且具公平性爭議的情況下，仍核准該申請。","video_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","raw_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/CXKiBIamLC4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}