{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0021.txt","chunk_index":21,"documents_referenced":["都委會7754次會議紀錄","都市計畫法第28條","都計法第24條","都議法第109條"],"end_seconds":6495,"keywords":["京華城","公展","容積獎勵","權力干預","行政加速","都委會","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公開展覽（公展）在都市計畫審議流程中的法律意義與實質功能","行政程序是否因政治壓力而違法加速","都市計畫法第24條之容積獎勵申請程序是否合法","都發局審查強度是否因上級指示而降低"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政程序是否因政治壓力而違法加速","都發局審查強度是否因上級指示而降低","都市計畫法第24條之容積獎勵申請程序是否合法","公開展覽（公展）在都市計畫審議流程中的法律意義與實質功能"],"participants":["嚴巴瑞","彭振聲","應曉薇","柯文哲","法官/審理人員","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["法官/審理人員","嚴巴瑞 (證人/相關人員)","彭振聲 (前副柯文哲)","柯文哲 (前柯文哲)","應曉薇 (議員)","邵琇珮 (證人/都發局相關人員)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0021","session_date":"2025-12-15","session_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":6195,"summary":"本段逐字稿討論京華城案在申請容積獎勵過程中，涉嫌受柯文哲市長、彭振聲副市長及應曉薇議員影響，導致都發局審查強度降低並異常加速行政流程。對比南港輪胎工廠及中泰賓館案，京華城案的審理時間僅約一年，較以往案件快了約10倍。此外，針對辯方主張公展僅為蒐集意見，法庭指出公展前之簽呈蓋章代表市政府已認可該計畫可送交都委會審議，而非單純蒐集意見。","video_id":"CXKiBIamLC4","raw_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/raw/chunk_0021.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/CXKiBIamLC4/cleaned/chunk_0021.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0021","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0021/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0021/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/CXKiBIamLC4:chunk_0021/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/CXKiBIamLC4","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}