{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["刑法第 320 條（公益侵佔罪，文中提及之第三三六條應為口誤或特定條文指涉，實指公益侵佔）","南高分院 112 年經上更字第 1609 號刑事判決（和明德行善團案）","政治獻金法","監察院 110 年 6 月 30 日之公開宣導"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["公益侵佔","專戶管理","政治獻金","易持有為所有","私有財產"],"legal_issues":["將政治獻金轉入非專戶之行為是否構成「易持有為所有」之侵佔行為","政治獻金是否屬於候選人之私有財產","政治獻金是否能成為公益侵佔罪之客體"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金是否屬於候選人之私有財產","政治獻金是否能成為公益侵佔罪之客體","將政治獻金轉入非專戶之行為是否構成「易持有為所有」之侵佔行為"],"participants":["柯文哲","法官/審判人員","監察院","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["法官/審判人員","柯文哲（候選人/被告）","辯護人","監察院"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"本段文字分析政治獻金的法律性質，強調其具有高度公益性而非候選人之私有財產。透過引用監察院之宣導及南高分院關於「和明德行善團」公益侵佔罪之判決，論證將公益性質之款項（如政治獻金）轉入私人帳戶或與私產混同，即構成「以持有為所有」之侵佔行為，進而推論候選人若將政治獻金轉出至非專戶，可能構成公益侵佔罪。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}