{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0012.txt","chunk_index":12,"documents_referenced":["木可公司帳戶紀錄","李文娟與橘子之對話紀錄","第一銀行匯款單（三張）","肖像權授權合約","股票交易紀錄","轉匯單（柯文哲至柯富瑤）"],"end_seconds":3840,"keywords":["1500萬元","利益輸送","掏空","政治獻金","木可公司","肖像權授權"],"legal_issues":["候選人使用自身肖像是否需支付授權費之法律爭議","政治獻金之用途是否涉嫌非法抽成或掏空","肖像權授權契約之合理性與對價關係","資金流向是否構成洗錢或非法挪用（從政治獻金至個人股票投資）"],"legal_issues_raw":["肖像權授權契約之合理性與對價關係","政治獻金之用途是否涉嫌非法抽成或掏空","資金流向是否構成洗錢或非法挪用（從政治獻金至個人股票投資）","候選人使用自身肖像是否需支付授權費之法律爭議"],"participants":["分析者","李文娟","柯富瑤","柯文哲","橘子","陳佩琪"],"participants_raw":["分析者（發言人）","李文娟","柯文哲","橘子","陳佩琪","柯富瑤"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0012","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3540,"summary":"本段逐字稿分析關於柯文哲與木可公司之間肖像權授權費的爭議。重點在於李文娟（木可公司相關人員）自行簽約、計算並收款，將政治獻金以「肖像權授權」名義抽成約1,500萬元轉至木可公司，隨後其中450萬元轉匯給柯文哲，再由柯文哲轉給其子女柯富瑤購買股票。分析者認為此行為涉嫌掏空政治獻金，且在選舉關鍵期抽走資金不合理。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0012.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0012.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0012","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0012/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0012/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0012/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}