{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0014.txt","chunk_index":14,"documents_referenced":["木可好店官網後台紀錄","李婉軒與李文宗之通訊訊息","柯文哲官方社群 IG 貼文","民眾黨官網","陳志涵臉書貼文"],"end_seconds":4430,"keywords":["募款小物","政治獻金","木可好店","科目款","選戰經費"],"legal_issues":["刻意刪除「非政治獻金平台」之標示是否構成欺騙或誤導消費者","募款所得之款項性質認定（政治獻金 vs. 商品銷售收入）","募款行為是否規避政治獻金法之規範"],"legal_issues_raw":["募款行為是否規避政治獻金法之規範","刻意刪除「非政治獻金平台」之標示是否構成欺騙或誤導消費者","募款所得之款項性質認定（政治獻金 vs. 商品銷售收入）"],"participants":["李婉軒","李文宗","柯文哲","陳志涵"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","陳志涵","李婉軒","李文宗"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0014","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4130,"summary":"本段文字主要討論柯文哲及其競選團隊透過「木可好店」銷售募款小物之行為，質疑其性質實為募款而非單純商品銷售。內容提及柯文哲官方社群及幕僚陳志涵均明確將其定義為「募款」與「選戰經費」，且內部對話顯示，相關人員曾討論是否在官網註明「非政治獻金平台」，但最終將該警語刪除，意圖誤導消費者認為購買商品即等同於贊助柯文哲，以提高銷售量。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0014.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0014.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0014","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0014/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0014/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0014/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}