{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["起訴書"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["公益侵佔","收受賄賂","木可公司","民眾黨","無罪答辯","眾望基金會","背信","行為責任"],"legal_issues":["公益侵佔與背信之指控","收受賄賂之認定（針對210萬元捐贈及便當會款項）","行為責任與行為人責任之區分（幕僚身分是否必然構成犯罪）","證據能力與證明力之爭議（質疑檢方截取證據及事後反推之邏輯）"],"legal_issues_raw":["行為責任與行為人責任之區分（幕僚身分是否必然構成犯罪）","收受賄賂之認定（針對210萬元捐贈及便當會款項）","公益侵佔與背信之指控","證據能力與證明力之爭議（質疑檢方截取證據及事後反推之邏輯）"],"participants":["唐律師（辯護人）","審判長","李文宗"],"participants_raw":["審判長","唐律師（辯護人）","李文宗（被告）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"本段逐字稿為被告李文宗的辯護人唐律師進行最後辯論的開場。唐律師首先對檢察官的論告提出質疑，認為其採取感性渲染而非依據證據，且存在以事後證據反推及截取片段證據之問題。針對本案，辯護方主張李文宗全部無罪，並將辯論重點分為三部分：背景事實（釐清李文宗在市府及民眾黨中的實際職責）、是否違背職務收受賄賂（針對210萬元捐贈及便當會款項），以及公益侵佔與背信之指控。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}