{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0032.txt","chunk_index":32,"documents_referenced":["政治獻金捐款名單","最高法院108年台上字638號判決","黃景茂之行事曆"],"end_seconds":9740,"keywords":["京華城案","推測之詞","收賄","政治獻金","證據能力","貪汙治罪條例"],"legal_issues":["收受賄賂之主體與對象（政黨捐款是否等同於個人收賄）","收賄之對價關係與時間軸之關聯性","間接證據之採信標準（最高法院108年台上字638號判決之適用）"],"legal_issues_raw":["收受賄賂之主體與對象（政黨捐款是否等同於個人收賄）","間接證據之採信標準（最高法院108年台上字638號判決之適用）","收賄之對價關係與時間軸之關聯性"],"participants":["公訴人","吳順民","張哲陽","彭振聲","應曉薇","朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","蔡碧如","辯護律師（發言者）","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","公訴人（被提及）","柯文哲（被提及）","朱亞虎（被提及）","李文宗（被提及）","彭振聲（被提及）","黃景茂（被提及）","應曉薇（被提及）","吳順民（被提及）","蔡碧如（被提及）","張哲陽（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0032","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":9440,"summary":"辯方針對收賄指控進行辯論，首先質疑公訴人關於「民眾黨之錢不等於柯文哲之錢」的邏輯，認為若政治獻金捐給政黨而非個人，則不構成收受賄賂。接著針對公訴人引用最高法院判決（108年台上字638號）來採信朱亞虎推測之詞彙提出反駁，認為該判決之基礎是基於感官知覺的合理推論，而本案中朱亞虎對柯文哲心情的推測缺乏事實基礎。最後，針對公訴人提出的時間軸及捐款名單傳送對象提出質疑，主張檢方刻意塑造李文宗之特殊地位，但實際事實與起訴內容不符。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0032.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0032.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0032","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0032/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0032/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0032/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}