{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0033.txt","chunk_index":33,"documents_referenced":["109年2月24日張鈺萱簽署之三版簽稿","109年4月5日訊息","陳俊源109年2月18日之貼文","陳情注意事項","黃景茂刑事歷記（關於2月20日、21日會議紀錄）"],"end_seconds":10035,"keywords":["便當會","研議","行政流程","都委會","都發局","陳情注意事項"],"legal_issues":["是否違反「陳情注意事項第9點」","行政決策之意向形成時間點（109年2月18日會面後之結論）","行政程序是否符合都發局「便當會」之標準作業流程","起訴事實之合理性分析"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政程序是否符合都發局「便當會」之標準作業流程","是否違反「陳情注意事項第9點」","行政決策之意向形成時間點（109年2月18日會面後之結論）","起訴事實之合理性分析"],"participants":["吳順民","廖","張鈺萱","彭振聲","應曉薇","柯文哲","楊智勝","沈慶京","閻邦瑞","陳俊源","黃景茂","黃珊珊"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","黃珊珊","彭振聲","黃景茂","應曉薇","吳順民","張鈺萱","閻邦瑞","楊智勝","陳俊源","廖檢察官","沈慶京"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0033","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":9735,"summary":"本段內容主要在分析都發局處理特定案件的流程，旨在論證在109年2月18日的會面後，都發局內部已達成同意送交都委會研議的結論。辯方透過分析「便當會」的標準流程、證人（張鈺萱、閻邦瑞、楊智勝）的證詞、外部人士（吳順民）的陳述以及陳俊源的貼文，試圖證明柯文哲市長後續的決策是基於都發局既有的專業建議，而非違法干預，並針對檢察官指控違反「陳情注意事項第9點」進行初步回應。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0033.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0033.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0033","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0033/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0033/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0033/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}