{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0034.txt","chunk_index":34,"documents_referenced":["109年2月24日簽會紀錄（都發局會辦法務局）","109年3月12日朱亞虎發給應曉薇之訊息","109年3月5日會辦單","109年8月16日朱亞虎發給陳安芝之訊息","110年8月1日訊息","陳情注意事項第九點"],"end_seconds":10330,"keywords":["109年2月20日會面","京華城案","政治獻金","行政訴訟","證人陳述","陳情注意事項"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金與京華城案是否存在對價關係","是否違反陳情注意事項第九點（關於訴訟中不得陳情之規定）","行政訴訟標的與陳情事件是否為同一案件之認定","證人（朱亞虎）陳述之可信度與合理性分析"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否違反陳情注意事項第九點（關於訴訟中不得陳情之規定）","行政訴訟標的與陳情事件是否為同一案件之認定","證人（朱亞虎）陳述之可信度與合理性分析","政治獻金與京華城案是否存在對價關係"],"participants":["吳順民","彭振聲","朱亞虎","柯文哲","沈慶京","法官/審理人員","辯方/","陳安芝","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["法官/審理人員","辯方/發言人","柯文哲","彭振聲","吳順民","黃景茂","朱亞虎","沈慶京","陳安芝"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0034","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":10030,"summary":"本段紀錄主要討論兩大議題：首先是針對是否違反「陳情注意事項第九點」之爭議，辯方主張相關人員（如彭振聲、黃景茂等）對該規定不認知，且法務局並未反對，且行政訴訟之標的與陳情事件並非同一案件，故不構成違反；其次，針對109年2月20日柯文哲與相關人員會面之內容，分析朱亞虎的陳述及其對210萬政治獻金與京華城案關聯性的認知，旨在質疑其證詞之合理性。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0034.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0034.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0034","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0034/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0034/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0034/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}