{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0035.txt","chunk_index":35,"documents_referenced":["109年3月19日前之PDF文件（關於政治捐贈法條）","112年8月1日之通訊訊息","朱亞虎手機數位鑑識紀錄"],"end_seconds":10625,"keywords":["京華城","政治獻金","數位鑑識","期約賄賂","罪疑唯輕"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金捐贈名義是否涉及隱匿或欺騙","是否構成期約賄賂之合意","證據之認定是否符合罪疑唯輕原則"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成期約賄賂之合意","政治獻金捐贈名義是否涉及隱匿或欺騙","證據之認定是否符合罪疑唯輕原則"],"participants":["張志澄","朱亞虎","柯文哲","沈慶京","洪秀鳳","辯護律師（發言者）","陳俊妍","陳安慈"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","朱亞虎（被告/提及者）","陳安慈（提及者）","柯文哲（提及者）","沈慶京（提及者）","張志澄（提及者）","洪秀鳳（提及者）","陳俊妍（提及者）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"DS56afN36A8:chunk_0035","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"DS56afN36A8","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":10325,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論被告朱亞虎與柯文哲、沈慶京之間是否存在期約賄賂之合意。辯方分析朱亞虎發送之訊息內容，認為其與陳安慈的對話顯示當時並無賄賂共識，且質疑檢方無法排除其他解釋（如單純對接見感到滿意或發牢騷）。此外，針對以七人名義捐款之行為，辯方主張係因政治獻金法之限制而非刻意隱藏，主張應適用罪疑唯輕原則。","video_id":"DS56afN36A8","raw_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/raw/chunk_0035.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/DS56afN36A8/cleaned/chunk_0035.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0035","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0035/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0035/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/DS56afN36A8:chunk_0035/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/DS56afN36A8","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}