{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0000.txt","chunk_index":0,"documents_referenced":["吳順民之報稅證明","地方民意代表費用支給及村里長事務補助費補助條例","議會助理申報清冊"],"end_seconds":300,"keywords":["公益捐贈","受賄罪","專業勞務","對價關係","洗錢防制法","犯罪所得"],"legal_issues":["受賄罪","洗錢罪"],"legal_issues_raw":["受賄罪","洗錢罪"],"participants":["吳順民","應曉薇","沈慶京","王孫凱","謝偶倫（辯護律師）","陳嘉明"],"participants_raw":["謝偶倫（辯護律師）","應曉薇（被告）","吳順民（證人/相關人）","沈慶京（相關人）","王孫凱（相關人）","陳嘉明（相關人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0000","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":0,"summary":"被告應曉薇之辯護律師謝偶倫針對受賄罪與洗錢罪進行辯護。律師主張吳順民受領之薪資係基於其專業顧問勞務之正當對價，與應曉薇之議員職務無關，且缺乏對價合意，故不成立受賄罪；關於洗錢罪部分，則主張五協會收受之款項屬公益捐贈而非犯罪所得，且應曉薇本身財務狀況穩定，缺乏洗錢之動機與必要性。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0000.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0000.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0000","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0000/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0000/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0000/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}