{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0002.txt","chunk_index":2,"documents_referenced":["110年臺上大字第521號大法庭裁定","最高法院103年臺上字1327號判決","貪汙治罪條例第五條第一項第三款"],"end_seconds":890,"keywords":["上下隸屬關係","圖利罪","憲政分權","收賄罪","民意代表","職務範圍"],"legal_issues":["市議員與市府公務員之間是否存在行政體系內的上下隸屬關係","收賄罪（違背職務或不違背職務）與圖利罪的區分標準","本案起訴法條之適用是否正確","民意代表在議場外的施壓、關說、請託是否屬於其職務範圍"],"legal_issues_raw":["民意代表在議場外的施壓、關說、請託是否屬於其職務範圍","收賄罪（違背職務或不違背職務）與圖利罪的區分標準","市議員與市府公務員之間是否存在行政體系內的上下隸屬關係","本案起訴法條之適用是否正確"],"participants":["應曉薇","檢察官","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","檢察官（提及）","應曉薇（被告/議員）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0002","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":590,"summary":"辯護人針對被告（應曉薇議員）是否構成收賄罪進行法律論證。辯方主張，根據最高法院103年台上字1327號判決，判斷收賄罪之關鍵在於被告與受影響公務員之間是否存在「行政體系內的上下隸屬關係」。由於臺北市議會與臺北市政府屬憲政分權關係，議員對市府公務員不具指揮權，不具備上下隸屬關係，因此其施壓、關說等行為不屬於職務範圍，不應適用收賄罪，而應討論是否涉及圖利罪。辯方進一步指出，即便參考檢察官援引的110年大法庭裁定，本案在法律適用上仍屬錯誤。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0002.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0002.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0002","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0002/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0002/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0002/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}