{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0003.txt","chunk_index":3,"documents_referenced":["103年判決","110年大法庭裁定","地方制度法","貪汙治罪條例第五條第一項第三款"],"end_seconds":1185,"keywords":["公務活動","名義代表","大法庭裁定","排他互斥","構成要件","職務上行為","賄賂罪"],"legal_issues":["刑事法中排他互斥構成要件之邏輯（如：違背職務與不違背職務之區分）","名義代表之行為是否構成《貪汙治罪條例》第五條第一項第三款之職務上行為","職務上行為之認定標準（依據110年大法庭裁定）"],"legal_issues_raw":["名義代表之行為是否構成《貪汙治罪條例》第五條第一項第三款之職務上行為","職務上行為之認定標準（依據110年大法庭裁定）","刑事法中排他互斥構成要件之邏輯（如：違背職務與不違背職務之區分）"],"participants":["劉秀玲","吳順民","張立麗","彭振聲","應曉薇","林之語","檢察官","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","黃景茂","彭振聲","吳順民","林之語","張立麗","劉秀玲","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0003","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":885,"summary":"本段文字主要討論如何運用110年大法庭裁定之標準，判定名義代表（如應曉薇）之行為是否屬於「職務上行為」。文中將大法庭對公務活動的分類（形式上公務活動、相類客觀公務活動、公務活動延伸行為）應用於本案多項具體行為（如質詢、協調會、拜會、便當會等），主張該19項行為均屬職務上行為。隨後，論述者轉而討論刑事法體系中「排他互斥之構成要件」的邏輯，旨在區分「不違背職務收受賄賂」與「違背職務收受賄賂」之法律評價。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0003.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0003.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0003","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0003/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0003/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0003/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}